About Me
- Name: sandegaye
- Location: Tellico Plains, Tennessee, United States
I am a spiritual being having a physical experience. I love delving into the inner world & learning all I can about why I'm here & where I'm going. My mother, now transitioned to another plane, was a Cherokee shaman. She taught me the meaning of 'Namaste'.. meaning 'I recognize the God in you', and 'Nokomis'.. meaning 'Walk in Beauty', a Navajo term, that tells us to walk in balance with all of earth. My father, also transitioned, was a fun-loving Irishman who taught me the joy of risktaking, traveling, & living life to its fullest. I have hopefully taken the best of their offerings in forming the 'me' I am today. I am the mother of six, grandmother of five, stepmother of 2 more & step-gram for 6 more. My cup is full & running over..;o) My goal is to live 'juicy'!
Links
Archives
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
Saturday, December 10, 2005
We're keeping good company.. no global warming & no human rights..
U.S. walks out during climate change talks
By ANDREW C. REVKIN
THE NEW YORK TIMES
MONTREAL -- The United States and China, the world's current and projected leaders in emissions of greenhouse gases, refused Friday to agree to mandatory steps to curtail them as two weeks of U.N. talks on global warming neared an end.
In a sign of its growing isolation at the meeting, the Bush administration came under sharp criticism for walking out of informal discussions shortly after midnight on finding new ways to reduce emissions under the United Nations' 1992 treaty on climate change.
The walkout, by Harlan Watson, the United States' chief negotiator here, came on the last day of talks in which the administration was repeatedly assailed by the leaders of other wealthy industrialized nations for refusing to negotiate to advance the goals of that treaty.
At a closed session of about 50 delegates, Watson objected to the proposed title of a statement calling for long-term international cooperation to carry out the 1992 climate treaty, participants said. He then got up from the table and departed.
Environmentalists here called his actions the capstone of two weeks of American efforts to prevent any fresh initiatives from being discussed. "This shows just how willing the U.S. administration is to walk away from a healthy planet and its responsibilities to its own people," said Jennifer Morgan, director of the climate change project at the World Wildlife Fund.
The meeting here is ending much as it began. The world's major sources of greenhouse emissions -- the United States, big developing countries such as China and India, and a bloc led by Europe and Japan -- remain divided over how to proceed under both the 1992 treaty and the Kyoto Protocol, an addendum that took effect this year.
The original treaty -- since ratified by 189 nations, including the United States -- has no binding restrictions. The Kyoto pact does impose mandatory limits on industrialized nations, but they do not apply to developing nations, including China and India. The United States and Australia have rejected that pact.
On Friday, countries bound by the Kyoto Protocol were close to agreeing on a plan to negotiate a new set of targets and timetables for cutting emissions after its terms expire in 2012.
But under pressure from some countries that were already having trouble meeting Kyoto targets, the language included no specific year for completing talks on next steps, instead indicating that parties would "aim to complete" work "as soon as possible."
I always remark that "Life is pain" and I don't think I really understand that statement...yet.
I'm off to an island for a week, to try & numb my mind as to our so-called leadership. ;o)
You all have a super great week too!
I know that Bush's argument is purely financial (it will "hurt" America's economy if businesses have to retrofit factories to comply), but that is SUCH a weak argument!! Really, what's a higher cost: retrofitting now, or having to move major cities, like Manhattan and Boston, away from the water as it slowly rises and takes over the shorelines?
I read a study just a few months ago that outlined the potential costs to Boston's financial district if the Harbor rises 3" in upcoming years/decades...it's not pretty.
<< Home